Tag: Technology

  • RØDE microphone

    RØDE microphone

    RØDE NT-USB Mini review after one year of daily use  

    If you expect people to listen to you when you speak, the very least you can do is give them the courtesy of good quality audio. There is nothing worse than being distracted by someone who sounds as if they are talking into a yoghurt pot. It’s hard enough as it is to hold people’s attention on a video call, and you definitely don’t want to be less interesting than their inbox.

    With that in mind, I decided to upgrade my setup.

    I looked at various options, including Bluetooth headsets and dedicated Microsoft Teams products, but after a fair bit of research, mostly on YouTube, the RØDE NT-USB Mini kept standing out. RØDE are a well-respected brand, and this particular mic is keenly priced for what it can do. I’ve embedded a short demo video below so you can judge for yourself, but to my ear it makes my voice sound a lot warmer, more natural and less thin than the alternatives I tried, especially my old Plantronics headset.

    I’ve had my RØDE since June 2025, so this review is based on about a year of daily Teams use at the time of writing. I’ve also found that it works very nicely with Final Cut Pro, allowing me to record voiceovers directly onto the timeline of my project. I use it with a dedicated RØDE spring-mounted arm, which was totally worth getting. It elevates the whole experience. I’d say it’s now frictionless when it comes to answering a call, swinging it into position and folding it away tidily when not in use.

    I genuinely enjoy using this mic. If you position it fairly close to your mouth, it makes you sound at your best. I definitely now find myself speaking more slowly and with far greater confidence.

    The mic itself sits in a metal U-shaped mount. It comes with a detachable magnetic desk stand. The stand is well made and stable enough, but I didn’t really get on with it because it left the mic a bit too low for my setup. That is why I switched to the arm, which suits me much better.

    On the front there is a rotary volume control that also lets you switch monitoring on, so you can hear your own voice through headphones without distracting delay. Once you’ve used that properly, it is hard to go back. It makes speaking on calls or recording voiceovers feel much more natural.

    Round the back, you get a USB-C connection and a 3.5mm headphone socket. I paired mine with an old set of wired Sony noise-cancelling headphones and that has worked brilliantly. They feed my voice back into my ears for monitoring and also provide the audio for Teams and Zoom calls.

    Setup is refreshingly straightforward. It is class-compliant, so on Mac and Windows it is basically plug and play, with no drivers needed. RØDE also says it works with computers or tablets, and can be used with mobile devices using the right adaptor or cable. I installed the software mainly to check for firmware updates, but for everyday use I have hardly needed it at all.

    One practical point: this is not the most discreet option. I can usually keep it just out of shot on a video call, but people do sometimes notice it and comment on it. That does not bother me in the slightest, and it can actually be a useful ice-breaker, but if you want something almost invisible, a headset may still suit you better.

    Leave a Reply

  • Anker Mobile Power Bank

    Anker Mobile Power Bank

    When you’ve spent good money on decent tech, you quickly realise how dependent you are on it. Phone, watch, laptop. All useful right up to the moment the battery dies.

    For trips away, especially anything off-grid, a reliable power bank stops being a nice-to-have and becomes essential.

    I chose this Anker 20,000mAh portable charger. I’ve had it since December 2025, used it on several trips, and more recently put it through a fairly obsessive round of testing at home.

    I’m very happy with it.

    TL;DR

    •  Kept my iPhone 16 Pro going for about 4 days
    •  Ran out during day 5
    •  Recharges very quickly when you get the chance
    •  Built-in percentage display is genuinely useful- way better than the 4 vague LEDs you often get 
    •  Integrated USB-C lead is a simple but excellent feature
    •  The last 10% does not do anything

    Main features

    •  Built-in USB-C lead that can both charge devices and recharge the power bank
    •  Fast charging up to 87W
    •  20,000mAh capacity, roughly comparable to a MacBook Air battery in energy terms
    •  Digital display showing exact remaining charge
    •  Can charge up to three devices at once
    •  Charges itself quickly, I saw around 64W in real use
    •  Size roughly similar to an iPhone Pro in a case
    •  Weight 421g. For context, my phone is 262g and a pint of water is about 840g

    What is mAh ?

    Power banks are usually rated in mAh, which stands for milliamp hours.

    In simple terms, it is a measure of how much electrical charge the battery can deliver over time.

    So a 20,000mAh battery could theoretically supply:

    * 20 amps for 1 hour

    * 1 amp for 20 hours

    That is useful, but not the best way to compare devices.

    A better unit is watt hours, which accounts for voltage as well:

    Wh = (mAh × Voltage) ÷ 1,000

    Most lithium batteries use cells at around 3.7 volts:

    20,000 × 3.7 ÷ 1,000 ≈ 74Wh

    That gives you a much clearer idea of the actual energy available.

    Real-world testing

    Click here for my detailed test report

    Over about two and a half weeks, I ran a series of simple but repeatable tests to see what this battery actually delivers.

    I tracked starting and ending percentages for both the phone and the power bank across multiple sessions, including:

    * Charging my iPhone in normal overnight use

    * Charging the same phone in flight mode

    * Charging an Apple Watch Ultra

    * Charging a MacBook Air M4

    * Charging an iPad Air

    What I found

    iPhone performance

    In normal use, the battery delivered around:

    2.7% of iPhone charge for every 1% of battery used

    In practice, that works out at:

    roughly 2.4 to 2.7 full charges

    With the phone in flight mode, the picture changes:

    around 3.7% of iPhone charge per 1% of battery

    That is an improvement of roughly:

    35 to 40 percent – well worth having on a camping trip.  

    What that means in real life

    A simple way to think about it is to compare how much charge you get with how much you use each day.

    From my testing:

    * Normal use gives about 240% total phone charge

    * Efficient use i.e. flight mode gives about 300%

    Worked example

    If you use around 60% of your phone battery per day, for example from 90% down to 30%:

    * 240 ÷ 60 = 4 days of use

    * 300 ÷ 60 = 5 days of use

    That matches what I saw in practice.

    Apple Watch

    The Apple Watch barely registers.

    Each 1% of the battery delivered around 14 to 15% of charge to the watch.

    In practical terms, you can charge it well over a dozen times and not worry about it.

    MacBook Air

    The MacBook is a different story.

    Each 1% of battery delivered less than 1% to the laptop.

    That is enough for a useful top-up, but not a full recharge.

    iPad Air

    The iPad sits somewhere in between.

    Each 1% of battery delivered around 1.8 to 1.9% to the iPad.

    That works out at roughly one and a half to two full charges.

    The last 10 percent

    One consistent finding was that the final 10% of the battery was not meaningfully usable.

    Across multiple tests, that last portion delivered little or no practical charge.  It is best treated as reserve rather than capacity.

    Flight mode insight

    The most interesting finding from all of this was the impact of flight mode.

    With the phone connected normally, part of the energy is constantly being used for background activity. Syncing, notifications, general housekeeping.

    Switching to flight mode removes most of that.

    The result is a noticeable increase in charging efficiency. Not theoretical, but measurable.

    It is a simple trick, but worth remembering if you are trying to stretch things over several days.

    Verdict

    This is a well thought out, practical piece of kit.

    It does exactly what you want from a power bank. It is reliable, fast to recharge, and gives you a clear idea of how much capacity you have left.

    In real-world use:

    * Expect around 2.5 to 3 phone charges

    * More if you are careful with how you use it

    * Enough capacity for a long weekend off-grid without worry

    The built-in cable and percentage display are small details, but they make a difference in practice.

    If you are heading away from reliable power for a few days, this is a sensible thing to take with you.

    Check price on Amazon

    As an Amazon associate, I earn a small commission from qualifying purchases but they do not cost you a penny extra.  

    I buy all my own gear and write independent reviews. If you found this helpful,buy me a coffee.

    Leave a Reply

  • Starlink in Rural Cumbria

    Starlink in Rural Cumbria

    A Real-World Review for UK Remote Workers

    We live over a mile from the nearest fibre connection. Getting workable internet here has been frustrating  and at times impossible, though a price worth paying for living in such an extraordinary place.

    We started with BT copper. Speeds hovered around 1 Mbps on a good day. If the neighbours attempted to go online at the same time as us, it simply fell over.

    We moved to Solway Communications. Initially promising – around 15 Mbps, but after a takeover the service deteriorated to barely better than BT.

    Then we tried 4G. An external aerial occasionally delivered 40 Mbps. The problem was consistency. Weather and network demand ruled everything. It would fail at exactly the moment guests arrived and we tried to stream a film.

    Back in 2012, patchy internet was inconvenient.

    In 2026, it sits somewhere alongside water and electricity.

    I work from home. Video calls must not drop. Files must upload. We stream all television. The air source heat pump follows its schedule via Wi-Fi. The Ring doorbell depends on it.

    Reliable internet is no longer optional.

    If fibre ever reaches us, I would reassess. Until then, we needed something that simply worked.

    Installation

    In December 2024, we took the plunge.

    I arrived home at around 7pm to a large box and, like a child at Christmas, installed it immediately, by torchlight.

    The dish now sits high on the gable end, mounted on a pole. The cable runs through existing conduit into the bedroom.

    Setup is straightforward:

    • Download the Starlink app

    • Connect to the router

    • Use the in-app alignment tool to optimise positioning

    It requires an unobstructed view of the sky. Ours faces roughly south. If you’re concerned about obstructions, you can download the app in advance and use its sky-scanning tool from your proposed mounting point.

    The dish sits almost horizontal and includes a built-in heater that activates automatically to melt snow — a detail that matters in the UK.

    It is, essentially, install-and-forget technology.

    Performance

    Reliability has been exceptional.

    Unlike my old EE 4G setup  which required constant rebooting and adjustment, Starlink has simply stayed up. Uptime feels around 99.9%.

    Download speeds:

    • Typically 100–250 Mbps

    • Occasionally up to 300 Mbps

    • Rarely below 50 Mbps

    Upload speeds:

    • Usually 10–25 Mbps

    We routinely run two 4K streams while I’m on a video call, with no noticeable degradation.

    Speeds vary slightly with weather and demand, but nowhere near as dramatically as 4G did.

    Automatic software updates occur occasionally around 3am, briefly disconnecting the service.

    For remote professional work in rural Cumbria, it has been completely dependable.

    Power Consumption

    In normal operation, our dish draws roughly 30–40 watts.

    During snow melt, it draws more temporarily.

    For comparison:

    • Typical fibre ONT + router: ~10–20W combined

    • 4G router setup: ~10–25W

    • Starlink: roughly double typical fibre consumption

    In annual terms, 35W continuous equates to roughly 300 kWh per year. At typical UK electricity prices, that’s approximately £70–£90 annually.

    It’s not insignificant. But in the context of running a rural home  and compared to the productivity it enables — it feels entirely reasonable.

    Wi-Fi & Integration

    The router allows easy customisation of SSID and password via the app. I reused my previous network name so all devices and visiting friends  reconnected seamlessly.

    Coverage is good. However, due to the thick walls and layout of our converted barn, I added a TP-Link signal booster. Starlink sells its own mesh node for around £100 if you prefer to stay within their ecosystem.

    Cost

    When we signed up:

    • Equipment: ~£350

    • Monthly fee: £75

    There was only one plan available at the time.

    Now, UK residential plans start from around £35 per month, depending on service tier and region. In some cases, equipment and professional installation are included.

    Final Thoughts

    Starlink has transformed life here.

    It has enabled a fully remote professional career, reliable streaming, smart home functionality and general peace of mind.

    It is more expensive than fibre and uses more power. But where fibre does not exist, it is not merely a luxury, it is proper infrastructure.

    If fibre eventually reaches us, I would reassess. Until then, this is the first internet service we’ve had that simply works.

    A Note on the Referral Link

    If you decide to try Starlink, you’re welcome to use my referral link below. It may give us both a small account credit. I would recommend the service regardless.

    I buy all my own gear and write independent reviews. If you found this helpful, buy me a coffee.

    Leave a Reply